Tuesday, May 28, 2013
Small, Steady Steps for AS Displays
Monday, May 27, 2013
I-Zone Highlight: HoloVizio Lightfield Display
Thursday, May 23, 2013
Wearable Touch
Renesas Brings Pro-Cap In-House
Earlier this
week, ID roving reporter Geoff Walker posted here about the shifting relationship
between display makers and touch module makers (“The Battle between the Display Makers and the Touch-Module Makers
Intensifies.”) In short, many display makers are becoming
touch-module makers as well, bringing the process of adding touch capability to
their products in-house.
A case in point is
Renesas Electronics America, which introduced an extensive line of
pro-cap-enabled modules at this year’s Display Week. This is the first time
that Renesas has offered in-house pro-cap, for which it performs its own
optical bonding and develops its own sensors. The company’s customers, with
applications including medical, industrial, kiosk, and in-flight, have been
asking for this capability, according to Renesas representatives, and there’s
an obvious financial benefit to the do-it-yourself approach. – Jenny Donelan
Silver Nano 2.0
There’s More Than One Way to Roll a Display
Photo by Alfred Poor |
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Building a Better Bathroom Mirror
One of its general lighting demos is a ring (looking somewhat like a halo) that uses two LEDs in a circular guide with a diffuser to produce a bright, white light. Possible applications include vanity mirrors, and in researching this product category, GLT’s Brett Shriver found himself in a variety of home goods stores, checking out the potential competition. What he found was generally of “terrible quality,” he says, with cheap diffusers and suboptimal engineering. Backlighting requirements are more stringent than those of general lighting, of course. Still, GLT and other display companies expanding into general lighting ought to be able to raise the standard of living for those of us just trying to get a close shave or apply eyeliner in the morning. – Jenny Donelan
3D Keeps a Low Profile
There’s Still Money in (Replacing) CCFLs
LED drivers may not capture the public imagination like big colorful TVs do, but they are viable products that companies really need. With regard to the CCFL replacements: “There are not a lot of people who are willing to do that,” says Evancho. “This part of the business is actually picking up.” –Jenny Donelan
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
A Big Step for e-Paper
The reflective market right now is dominated by simple and dim reflective liquid-crystal displays, with at best poor color that is relegated to only sub-sections of the display. Now with the new E Ink Spectra technology, any part of the display can provide a deep black, a brighter and more paper-like white, or a red color to highlight sales or promotions. This is significant for two reasons. First, it shows a significant investment and advance toward capturing market share in the electronic-shelf label market.
The second reason for excitement steps us back to last year‘s breakthrough reported by Fuji-Xerox on full-color electrophoretic displays based on cyan/magenta/yellow switchable particles. We wondered, could more than 2 particles (black-white) ever be commercialized? The answer is now yes, and it should be interesting to see just how far this type of technology can continue to advance for signage. Don't expect this to lead to color e-Readers anytime soon, though, because each time you add another colored particle, the switching speed slows dramatically. None the less, it is great to see a significantly new and visibly compelling product from E Ink. Credit should be given also to the researchers at the former SiPix Corp, which was acquired by AUO and then E Ink, which developed the technology that underpins this new E Ink product. –Jason Heikenfeld
Giants to Miniatures: Exciting OLED Displays
In the Monday business conference and also during the keynote address by Samsung Display Co. CEO and President Dr. Kinam Kim, it was emphasized that AMOLED is driving revolutionary changes in the display world. With the opening of today’s exhibition, visitors can see for themselves what these displays look like.
LG Display is attracting a lot of attention from visitors with its full HD AMOLED TVs -- extremely large objects of desire for end users. LG's 55-in. curved 3D OLED display is just 4 mm thin. With this product demonstration, LG illustrates what is possible with OLEDs in terms of shape and design freedom. The company's flexible OLED screen likewise illustrates these design possibilities.
What is feasible in miniature is being demonstrated by eMagin, with its OLED microdisplays that are smaller than a stamp yet have a resolution of 1944 x 1224. These microdisplays can be used for virtual reality headsets employed in computer based 3D simulation and training, medical imaging, night vision imaging devices, and more. --Sven Murano
Flowers without Bees
If designers, display and otherwise, do not consider the role of a given device in relation to other devices, humans, and overall usage "flow," that device may well contribute to the ever-confusing buildup of interactive devices that do not interact with each other. The future health of the industry, said Buxton, depends on designers recognizing the necessity of "cross-pollination" among myriad devices. --Jenny Donelan
The Battle between the Display Makers and the Touch-Module Makers Intensifies
Photo source: www.digitaltrends.com
The thickness of the Ascend P2 smartphone is 8.4 mm (0.33 inches); this is slightly thicker than the Samsung Galaxy S4 at 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) and the Apple iPhone 5 at 7.6 mm (0.30 inches). Note that in consumer terms rather than display-engineer terms, we’re talking about differences of hundredths of an inch here – not a heck of a lot. The iPhone 5 uses “true” in-cell (both touchscreen electrodes are in the TFT array; the Galaxy S4 uses on-cell (both touchscreen electrodes are on top of the OLED encapsulation glass). The difference in thickness between any of these touch configurations supplied by a display maker versus the latest touch configuration supplied by a touch-module maker (touch on the underside of the cover-glass, known as OGS or “one glass solution”) is only around 100 microns (0.1 mm). Bob said during his seminar that “Some [smartphone] OEMs would sell their mother for 100 microns [reduction in product thickness].” In reality, 0.1 mm is a small portion of the difference in thickness between the Ascend P2 and the iPhone-5. The real battle isn’t about the thickness of the touch-display; it’s about who supplies the touch functionality.
According to DisplaySearch, the total revenue produced by touch-module makers in 2007 was $1.3 billion while in 2013 it will be $21.4 billion. The size of the touch market has become significant relative to the ~$100B display market, so the display-makers want a piece of the action. That’s the real driving force in in-cell, not technology or thickness. There’s beginning to be a strong possibility that over the next five years, the display industry will become the preferred touch-supplier for most high-volume consumer-electronics devices. Again using DisplaySearch numbers, revenue for mobile phones and tablets alone will account for 74% of the total touch market in 2018. If the display industry were to take all of that revenue, the touch-module industry would shrink to less than 40% of its current size. The battle is just beginning. –Geoff Walker
A Clear-eyed Look at Obstacles to OLED and Oxide TFT Success
For example, the ultimate solution for touch screens is to eliminate the separate touch module and integrate it into the display panel. But as Prof. Souk pointed out, there are plenty of barriers to adoption of this strategy. Bringing touch technology in-house can result in additional supply chain complications and reduced yields by adding complexity to the production processes. At the current time, it can make more sense to outsource the touch component, and let suppliers take on the risk and compete to provide the modules.
As for oxide TFTs, the technology offers some attractive potential in terms of improved electron mobility compared with the incumbent amorphous silicon (aSi), at a lower cost than the laser-annealed low-temperature polysilicon (LTPS). It has the potential to transform not only the large-format LCD industry, but may make the large OLED TV products feasible. Unfortunately, several problems remain before oxide TFT is truly ready for prime time, according to Prof. Souk. For example, as a semiconductor backplane, the material still has problems with stability in terms of the voltage threshold (Vth) and Vth uniformity across large areas. In addition, the planarization of the metal oxide surface is not as smooth as it needs to be; thin film devices such as OLEDs are adversely affected by relative small variations in thickness which in turn can affect performance.
Prof. Souk also addressed the OLED TV market. In addition to the oxide TFT problems described above, there are significant challenges involved in fabricating these large display panels. Small mask scanning (SMS) is the traditional approach to depositing the OLED emissive materials, but it is difficult to use successfully for large panels. Not only is the process very slow, it also has low yield ratios and there are problems with the materials mixing along their boundaries. Other deposition methods are under development, such as a vertical linear source, laser-induced thermal imaging using transfer from a carrier film, and nozzle printing of solution-based materials, but these have limitations of their own.
Some of these problems for large format OLED panels for TVs can be addressed by using color filters over a white-emitting OLED material. One problem with this approach is that the white OLED “backlight” relies on a tandem device that emits yellow and blue light, which mixes to produce white light. The red, green, and blue (RGB) filters then extract the desired light to create a full-color image. Since the backlight has spikes in the blue and yellow parts of the spectrum, however, it is not able to produce the required red and green parts of the image adequately.
None of this is to say that these technologies won’t eventually come to market at competitive price points with high quality performance. However, it was refreshing to hear about some of the shortcomings and bottlenecks standing between these technologies and commercial production. It is good to hear about future answers to our display problems, but it is also important to hear from knowledgeable sources who can describe the realistic obstacles that stand in the way of such success.--Alfred Poor
Monday, May 20, 2013
LG and Samsung: What They Will Show
So what's in store this year? If you guessed 56-in. OLED TVs, you'd be wrong. Based on today's announcements, the offerings are a bit more diverse this year, with LG promoting a curved 55-in. OLED TV prototype and a 5-in. plastic OLED panel. Samsung is highlighting a full HD mobile AMOLED display (4.99 inches) and an 85-in. Ultra HD LCD TV. There's more, of course, but you'll have to visit their booths to find out. Both companies, by the way, do an excellent job of exhibiting their displays. This year, Samsung will have an "experience zone" designed to highlight the differences between AMOLED and LCD panels. The phrase "eye popping" is overused among display industry journalists, but I suspect this particular exhibit will be. --Jenny Donelan